Desktop 2.0

[gv data="http://www.youtube.com/?v=M0ODskdEPnQ" width="350" height="350" zindex="-1"][/gv]Now this is a little bit closer to how I envisioned the new generation of computer desktops.  I’m not too sure how usable this would actually be in a real life scenario, but it certainly looks cool.  Don’t expect to be playing around with this anytime soon.  I would expect something similar to this in Windows Vienna which is slated for 2010 release.  Is it too much to ask to have a holographic desktop?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Google

This post was written with love by The Doop  My name is Craig Wood and I currently live in Louisville, KY with my wife Lori and our daughter Fenley. This site was setup while we were living in Iceland to help communicate with family members back home. Now it's just a repository for useless information. Read more from this author


About the Author

The Doop

My name is Craig Wood and I currently live in Louisville, KY with my wife Lori and our daughter Fenley. This site was setup while we were living in Iceland to help communicate with family members back home. Now it's just a repository for useless information.

One Response to “ Desktop 2.0 ”

  1. Certainly, if this were implemented, from a technological standpoint, it would be cool. No question. And God knows that technologically cool really speaks to me. Over and over again, in my job, I am guilty of falling in love with cool technologies (most recently Ajax in general and Dojo in particular). But inevitably, I am reminded that there must be some real business problem to be solved in order to make a cool technology viable. Otherwise, it’s just a plaything for techies (which is not, in and of itself, a bad thing).

    In this demo, I was very impressed with the vision, but had a hard time seeing how this would solve any significant business problem. Certainly, the innovative thinking behind it has the potential to make a difference. I think we are on the verge of seeing and expecting a great deal more from computers in terms of how we interact with them, and maybe that was really the point behind this. But it’s tough to see a video like that, where they give very concrete examples of what they propose, without thinking, “will this truly make things better, or is it just cool”? That’s always a tougher question to answer than it might seem.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.